Worksheet Summary for Middle Ear/Conductive Hearing Loss

Event Details

Description of Event

(1) Based on data and experience, develop list of otologic conditions to be targeted in the next 5 to 10 years. Include rationale.
Disease/Disorder/
Condition/ Target
Public Health Significance
e.g., high prevalence, severity, limited treatment options
Treatment Options e.g., none, ineffective, low benefit/risk ratioDisease Severity e.g., dire consequences, dire disabilities, compromised QOLEvidence Base e.g., none, some, limitedStage of readiness for research involving humans
Acute Otitis MediaHigh prevalence low morbidity, high cost- Prevnar, Pneumovax
- other vaccines
- antibiotics
- observation
- tympanocentesis (acute)
- symptomatic
- tubes for repeated AOM
- smoking cessession
- Day care, allergy management
- Adenoidectomy - recurrent
- Some "CAM" interventions
Usually mild but some complications can be serious: facial paralysis, meningitis, perforation, hearing lossModerate support for observation over antibiotics (Evidence B)
Good support for tubes for recurrent (Evid. B)
Vaccines (Evidence ?) Adenoidectomy (Evidence D)
High
Requires large cohorts Replication of European studies.
Otitis Media with EffusionLow morbidity high prevalence, high cost- antibiotics
- long term antibiotics
- tubes
- adenoidectomy
- allergy Rx
- reflux Rx
- "CAM" options
Mild hearing loss but long term consequences of language delay and middle ear complicationsGenerally good. But controversial. Depends on outcome measure.Excellent. Human Genetics. Animal work in this entity is not necessarily pertinent to humans. Infectious (including biofilm disease) vs. anatomical issues. Vaccines, allergy. Eustachian tube function? Studies of long term auditory processing still needed.
Congenital Syndromic ME problemslow prevalence high individual impactAtresia, ossicular anomalies,
x-linked
- Surgical
- unsatisfying
- BoneAnchored Hearing Aid
Can be debilitating, recurrent surgeries. Multiple specialists. BC aids not satisfactory. Unilateral dz mild. Bilateral dz severeEvidence level C (minimal)Only applicable to humans
Atelectasis/ Retraction Eustachian tube problemsuncommon but difficult management problemsLimited.
- Allergy treatment
- adenoidectomy
- reconsturctive surgery
Much understanding through human temporal bone labs. Mild to severe individually. Uncommon complication of otitis syndromes.Evidence - case series, level C and some DPossibly yes. Hampered by low incidence. Eustachian tuboplasty? Adenoidectomy? Medical Rx, surfactants, mucolytics
Ossicular reconstruction?low prevalence low morbidity (CHL)Many forms of ossicular reconstruction/prostheses.Moderate - conductive hearing lossesEvidence B-CGood. Innovations - few.
Cholesteatomalow prevalence, high severity and morbiditySurgical resectionRelatively severe requiring surgery. No non-surgical therapies used. Often chronic HL and problems with lifelong otorrhea. Potential CNS complicationsEmpirical Anecdotal. Evidence level CReady but no good ideas.
Otitis Externa5 low severity but very commontopical antibiotics mostly effectivemild to moderateEvidence B. PharmaGood. Innovations - few.
Otosclerosis/
Osteogenesis Imperfecta Pagets
5 1/300 people. Progressive loss and hearing morbidityconductive - excellent development of stapes procedure. Poor understanding of medical treatmentCauses progressive hearing loss. Range - conductive hearing loss to severe SN loss. Much understanding through human temporal bone labs.For surgery aimed at conductive loss is good Evidence B. For SN loss - fluorides or bisphosphonates.Very good for large scale RCT - fluorides or bisphosphonates.
Tympanic membrane perforation reconstruction5 common complication of OM and tubes. Low morbidityGrafting fibrous material, cartilage, alloderm, fat paper patchmoderate - hearing loss and infectionsEvidence B different materials usedGood. Growth factors, graft materials
Post-tympanostomy tube otorrhea6-Topical antibiotic drops
- Antimicrobial ear tubes
- Prophylactic gtts.
Mild. Some children with prior history of AOM are worse.Some evidence for Gtts and antimicrobial tubesGood. Need better strategies for recurrent infection prevention. Can ONLY be done in humans
(2) For each target otologic condition, categorize the current state of knowledge regarding the condition and its interventions (if any) and the stage of research necessary for full development of the intervention.
Disease/
Disorder/
Condition Target
Understanding of Dz/Disorder/ Condition e.g., natural hx, treatment altering natural courseUnderstanding of patho-physiologyIs there a therapeutic targettIs there Intervention geared to therapeutic targetDescribe intervention: any modality e.g., surgery, drug, device, drug, behaviorStage of development of intervention e.g., basic understanding/early translation, preclinical, clinical, definitive clinical trials, late translation
Acute Otitis MediaModerate. Questions exist about genetics, biofilm disease, viral etiologies, immunocom-petency. Extensive information about some pathogens.Poor. Questions of genetics, eustachian tube dysfunction, bacterial biofilm/ coloniesYes. Bacteria, mucins, viruses, environment/ habits Some NO: genetic factors.Yes but not satisfactory. Prevention strategies - some understoodAvoid smoking parents, avoid daycare, possible role of vaccines Over- prescription of antibiotics a problemAll available for widespread testing. Definitive studies require large multicenter studies.
Otitis Media with EffusionLots of evidence but some conflicting.
- Role of adenoidectomy - Role of antibiotics
Conflicted: bacterial, viral, eustachian tube, allergy, genetic.Several.
Root cause(s) unclear
Yes - some bacterial, yes for allergic, no for viral, no for ET, no for biofilm.
Pragmatic Rx (tubes) established
antibiotica, tubes, allergic management, adenoidectomyAvailable but new strategies are needed. Some strategies are ineffective but widely used (antibiotics, steroids, decongestants late translation to practitioners issues
Congenital Syndromic ME problemsGood understanding of anatomy, some understanding of genetics of syndromes but little insight into genetics of atresia. Much understanding through human temporal bone labs.Good DevelopmentalAnatomically - yes. Genetically - no or unsureYes but not satisfactorySurgery, BAHA.Innovative procedures by surgeons and BAHA development.
Hearing aid development
Atelectasis/ Retraction Eustachian tube problemsPoor. Unsure of genetic contribution to ET dysfunction. Pathophysiology of ET dysfunction?Poor.Yes - eustachian tube function.Yes. Empiric.Ventilation, reconstructionRudimentary
Ossicular reconstructionGood. Clinical and imagingGoodYes. Mechanical reconstructive techniques, adhesives. Compromised by ET function problems and inflammatory disease.Yes.Mechanical prostheses. Biocompatible tissue cement. Unsure of ME ventilationMature - late translation to practitioners
CholesteatomaGood in animal models and through human temporal bone histopathology.Good but various mechanisms cause controversy. Congenital cholesteatoma poorly understood.Keratinocytes? Early detection/ diagnosisEarly detection is a major problem. Earlier detection more satisfactory? Visual markers for keratinocytes (during surgery)Surgery - type of surgery. Evidence for second looks?Empirical, but improvements in imaging technology may improve diagnosis and management. Early detection - little progress. Prevention - unknown. Unsure if tubes prevent
Otitis ExternaGoodGoodYes - Bacteria/ fungiYesAppropriate antimiobials and steroidsGood. Some opportunities for very very recalcitrant cases.
Otosclerosis/
Osteogenesis Imperfecta?
Pagets
Incomplete. Most understanding from human temporal bone histopathology. Genetic disorder but several loci map but no genes identified; viral etiology also possible. OI better genetic understanding. Paget's Disease poorly understood - unsure if viral.Anatomically good - bone remodeling of the otic capsule. Molecular mechanism not understood - genetic viral.Yes. Bone cells osteoclasts/ blastsYesFluorides and bisphosphonatesKnowledge of reconstructive procedures is good (post translation) Mechanism of fluorides
Poorly understood. Mechanism of bisphosphonates is good.
Tympanic membrane perforationGood. Most understanding from clinical observations and human temporal bone histopathology.Good. Some healing issues. Wound healing research incompleteYes - fibrous and epithelial growth. Spontaneous closure ? MechanismYesCommon clinical practice - grafting surgeryFairly mature - late translation to practitioners standard of care. Room for improvement.
Post tympanostomy tube otorrheaModerate - bacterial etiology but question the role of biofilm.Moderate. Unsure how infections persistYes - bacteria in various phenotypes (sessile and planktonic)Yes but not entirely satisfactoryRemove tubes, antibiotics, preventionPrimary care docs giving oral antibiotics inappropriately Not following evidence
Electromecha-nical implants (ME procedure for inner ear problems - see inner ear group)

“?” = unresolved among workshop participants